As the title said, Sir Arthur C. Clarke passed away today. I remember him most from his show Mysterious Universe and from 2001: A Space Odyssey. I also remember listening to Rendezvous with Rama on audio book and enjoying it very much. While his TV series was not the most skeptical of shows, it was very entertaining. My favorite was the one on Haitian voodoo zombies. I found a few on Netflix a few months ago and enjoyed them almost as much as I did while watching it as a kid.
Feel free to leaving some comments about what you remember most about Arthur C. Clarke.
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Arthur C. Clarke Dies at Age 90
Monday, March 17, 2008
WWZFD
What WOULD Zombie Feynman do?
Pro-science, Mythbusters, zombies, Feynman, and a shot at string theorists...I think this one just became a personal favorite.
Saturday, March 15, 2008
More Scientology Protests Today
Looks like Anonymous is at it again. This this time, there were about 50 people across the street from the Scientology Center holding signs and wearing V masks. I honked a cheery tune as I drove past and got a cheer in response. I was in Qdoba earlier and found a stack of anti-Scientology fliers on the table. Keep up the good work guys.
Here are some links to last month's protests. (1, 2)
Thursday, March 13, 2008
Mensa's 10 smartest TV shows of all time
A few weeks ago, i ran across an article that listed ten television shows that Mensa claims are the smartest of all time. I was surprised not only by how poorly the article was written, but also with some of the shows they chose.
Apparently putting a lot of science in a show makes it smart by default, regardless of how accurate or correct it might be (or how good the show is otherwise). I spent a summer in Waco, Texas with 3 seasons of CSI on my computer. Waco can be a dull place, and boredom can be great motivation to watch bad television, but i couldn't bring myself to continue watching past the episode where the lead investigator calculates the time it took a man to fall from a construction site based on the fact that his terminal velocity was 9.8 meters per second squared.
I've only seen about five of the shows on Mensa's list and disagree with about four of them. It's ok to like bad TV, but don't try to justify it to everybody else by writing an article claiming that your ten favorite shows are the smartest "of all time".
On a related note, the Freakonomics blog had a post back in January about the smart and dumb books in which they discussed the findings of a Cal Tech student who correlated popular books (from facebook) with S.A.T scores (from the averages at a particular school). The top 5 include Lolita, 100 Years of Solitude, Crime and Punishment, Atlas Shrugged, and Freakonomics (surprised?). The two things I like most about this list are 1)it's objectiveness and 2)Fahrenheit 451 is among the dumbest books. I think it'd be interesting to do something similar with television.
Skeptics' Biblical Circle
This fortnight's Skeptics' Circle has been posted at Happy Jihad's House of Pancakes. It's chock full of goodness.
Phil Plait, the Bad Astronomer [who is actually a good astronomer], has put up a list of "Ten things you don’t know about the Milky Way Galaxy." I don't want to ruin the list for you, but one fact caught my eye. The consensus is that at the center of our galaxy is a supermassive black hole. However, new research suggests the galactic center is actually full of creamy nougat. Interesting stuff.
Wednesday, March 12, 2008
Skepticism in Art
A recent trip to the St. Louis Art Museum, combined with a recent read-though of Neil Gaiman's American Gods (available on the web for free for the rest of March), have gotten me thinking about art, mostly of the visual sort. I won't say much about what I've been pondering, because if I start talking about art I'll show exactly how little I know about it. But I do want to broadcast a few thoughts.
I want to see more art about skepticism or skeptical ideas. I'm not sure how much currently exists, and in what form, but wherever it is I want to see it. If it doesn't exist, I hope people will start making it. If no one does, I can try it myself, but I don't think anyone will like the result. That includes me.
Take, for instance, my photoshopped picture at the top of the page. It's something I did in about twenty minutes after seeing a perfect picture for the joke. It's not art, it's a gag. But that's what we can expect from me. Don't leave this in my hands.
Send me some links to skeptically-themed art and I'll be grateful. You will be too, if James Randi, Ace Attorney has anything to say about it.
-Thanks to the Skepchick for her picture of Randi on flickr, which I shamelessly stole.
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
We met Randi!
As posted earlier, James Randi spoke at UIUC. Four of us Gateway Skeptics were able to make the 3 hour (each way) road trip and were rewarded with the chance to meet Randi and ask him a few question. He was even kind enough to pose for a photo (contrary to his expression). Afterwards, we went out for some great deep dish pizza with a few fellow bloggers. Click below for a synopsis of the evening.
The lecture was sponsored by the Atheists, Agnostics and Freethinkers organization from UIUC. Apparently, the president of the club was inspired by The Amaz!ng Meeting to start the organization on his campus and was dedicated to getting Randi on campus. It seems like he succeeded. Unbeknownst to us, they also invited Nobel laureate Dr. Richard J. Roberts to speak about atheism.
The introduction to Dr. Roberts lecture was strange to say the least. The student in charge knew (and admitted to knowing) very little about Dr. Roberts research and it did not seem like he was going to take the time to lern about it. Also, the student's cell phone went off no fewer than three times while he was at the podium. It was funny yet sad.
Dr. Roberts talk on atheism focused mostly on the lack of scientific questioning in religion. He also touched on contradictions in religious teachings, the uselessness of prayer, why there is evil and several other topics that would be typical in a Richard Dawkins lecture. This included claiming that indoctrinating children into a particular religion is a form of child abuse. Unlike Dawkins, however, Dr. Roberts did not seem to be an authority on the topic. When asked in the Q & A session after lectures, Dr. Roberts admitting to only studying comparative religions for a handful of semesters while in school. I think it showed.
On of the most curious aspects of his talk was his discussion on schizophrenia. Dr. Roberts claims that many personal religious experiences can be attributed to schizophrenia. Since I have heard similar claims elsewhere, that did not strike me as a strange claim. What did was when he claimed that those who are intelligent and schizophrenic are most often diagnosed as having bipolar disorder while those of lesser intelligence are deemed schizophrenic and crazy. He claimed that the intelligent individuals are able to separate their hallucination from reality while others cannot. It was a strange tangent that I'm not sure is factually correct.
Before I leave Dr. Roberts for The Amazing Randi, I would like to share one of his quotes from the Q&A session. Dr. Roberts was discussing why he became a scientist. He attributed his curiosity to being able make fireworks as a child. He then made the following comment:I know why terrorists like explosions. Everyone likes a good explosion.
Call me strange, but I don't think that's the reason terrorists blow things up.
Overall I think Dr. Roberts did a mediocre job selling atheism. However, he was talking to a audience who was mostly non-religious so little harm was done.
After Dr. Roberts talk, the president of Atheists, Agnostics and Freethinkers got up to introduce Randi. While he was better than the student who introduced Dr. Roberts, he wasn't much better. I won't go into details but I will say that it is a good thing Randi needs no introduction.
Randi's talk opened with a video montage chronicling some of his achievements as a skeptic and debunker. After the video, Randi came on stage to a healthy applause from the few hundred in the audience.
Randi focused the beginning of his talk on how people are fooled by others and how they fool themselves. This was accomplished by a few anecdotes and a few magic tricks. Randi then went on to explain the Million Dollar Challenge. This of course led to the story of Sylvia Browne accepting the challenge and never following through with the testing. This discussion included some impersonations of Sylvia by Randi and his looking for the proper name to call her regarding her insatiable money lust [Flavin reminds me this was regarding Montel William's money lust indicated by his having Slyvia on so often]: What do they call that in the media business? Oh yeah, a whore.
Randi then moved on to discussing how smart people are fooled while making a few despairing comments regard those with PhDs. There were in jest of course. The talk then turned to homeopathy and how ridiculous the dilutions are. This led to a discussion of faith healers, and we were treated to two video clips of Randi on the Tonight Show with Carson where Randi exposed Peter Popov (this clip is similar but not the same) and psychic surgery. This pretty much concluded Randi's lecture. It was quite wonderful as the crowd's standing ovation implied.
The Q & A session, however, was not as great. Sans one or two questions, those asked were neither insightful nor new. They ranged from simple questions about religion to asking Randi if he believes in ghosts. One question, however, stood out among the others as ridiculous. I'll try to tell it slow so you can enjoy it.
An Asian student stepped up to the microphone and told a story about a car accident he was in. Apparently, he was involved in a hit and run where he did the running. He claimed he was scared and did not know what to do so he left the scene of the crime. When the cops later came to his door, he denied having anything to do with the collision so he was promptly cuffed and hauled off and rightfully so. The kid was eventually let off the hook by the judge and what the kid described as "the grace of Jesus". Why Jesus would bother with this kid and his traffic violations, I do not know. Anyway, this story went on for a good two minutes before some in the audience started shouting "Get to the question!" The kid stuttered and then asked is science can explain love. There was an awkward silence as the audience dealt with the non sequitur. Randi and Dr. Roberts responded with a curt "No." This was not good enough for the kid at the mic as he continued by rambling about the saying of Jesus which Randi promptly questioned the validity of. Eventually the kids mic was turned off after being booed by the audience. The kid proceeded to stand behind the dead microphone for approximately 10 minutes, waiting to speak again. Eventually, he must have realized where he was and sat back down. Again, funny yet sad.
After the lecture, we were able to get a picture with Randi and ask him a few questions one-on-one. We then met up with the Action Skeptics, Tom, and two of his friends. (1, 2, 3). We grabbed some pizza and talked religion, blogs, comics and video games, as young skeptics often do. As the picture illustrates, it was an enjoyable end to the night.
Here's suggesting we invite Randi to speak in St. Louis.
Monday, March 10, 2008
And My Wife
I saw this very funny video today on Swift. How have I not heard of this guy, Tim Minchin, before?
Thursday, March 6, 2008
More info on the Randi Lecture
Since I'm sure that many of you don't go searching through the comments, I'll repost Akusai's comment here.
Just up on Randi's site:Let's hope Randi comes through on the meet-up. Also, let me know if you want to go so we can car pool. It looks like we can leave at about 3:30 and make it in time (it's about a 3 hr 10 min drive). Continue Reading...
Monday, March 10 2008, 7:00pm - 8:00pm
Randi will be speaking at the Lincoln Hall Theater located in Lincoln Hall in the main quad at the University of Illinois at 7pm in a lecture entitled, "Science, Magic, and Belief."
And convenient directions from all points on the compass.
I kindly requested in an e-mail to Randi that he might consider a meet-up after the lecture if time permits, but no word either way on that. Michael Shermer said yes a couple of years ago to the same question (and that was a lot of fun) so maybe Randi will, too...
Monday, March 3, 2008
It May Be 8 PM, But I Think I Need More Coffee
I'm too bogged down with homework to make this post anything like what it should be, so I apologize ferociously. In fact, I can't even spare the time to read the paper I found. I'm lobbing it to you, dear reader.
So can someone please tell me what The Nonequilibrium Nature of Culinary Evolution is about, and why it's on the physics arXiv?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
